‘The Only Disability in Life Is A Bad Attitude':
So-Called 'Inspirational' Media in The Age of Trump
Eve B. Lee / Faculty Advisor: Kyle Barnett
This study explores the reactions of ideologically
divergent social media users to so-called "inspiration porn," or
mediated images of physically disabled persons doing ordinary--or
extraordinary--activities, relegating those depicted to vehicles for the
emotional or spiritual gratification of nondisabled or typically able (or,
among disabled observers, differently so) persons. This is important because
although a quarter of American adults identify as living with a disability
themselves, ableism remains very internalized; others' experience is still very
voyeuristic when presented in this medium. The objective of this study is to
describe an approximate correlation--either positive or negative--between the
popularity of inspiration porn and the social identities of those adults who
consume it. The goal is to understand, through the lenses of Erving Goffman's
framing theory and Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance, how
inspiration porn not only confirms but also contradicts concepts of what it
means to be a political conservative or a political liberal in America. These
theories are discussed with a view to define the efficacy of inspiration porn's
intended function on social media users, even threatening their most inviolable
identities of political ideology, religion, education, and disability. Results
suggest that, despite the majority of respondents skewing liberal, agnostic or
atheist, college educated, and having no personal disability experience, those
who consistently interacted with inspiration porn media the most exhibited a
tendency to favor conservative politics, espouse evangelical Christianity, lack
college education, and have an experience of disability--either in themselves,
someone close to them, or both.